Building America HomeBuilding America Industrialized Housing PartnershipBAIHP - Conducted by FSEC

Building America Home

You are here: > BAIHP > Publications > BAIHP Annual > Appendix D (Cont'd)
FSEC Online Publications
Reference Publication:   Chandra, Subrato, Neil Moyer, Danny Parker, David Beal, David Chasar, Eric Martin, Janet McIlvaine, Ross McCluney, Andrew Gordon, Mike Lubliner, Mike McSorley, Ken Fonorow, Mike Mullens, Mark McGinley, Stephanie Hutchinson, David Hoak, and Linda Tozer. Building America Industrialized Housing Partnership, Annual Report - Fourth Budget Period. 04/01/03-03/31/04.
Building America Industrialized Housing Partnership, Annual Report - Fourth Budget Period

TRIP REPORT
3 Houses - Houston TX
Problem Home Inspection, Testing and Possible Solutions

DATE
June 26, 2001

PURPOSE

  • Assist service and engineering staff in determining the source or probable cause of moisture-related problems and aid in repairs.
  • Discuss solutions related to the manufacturing process and propose amendments that would avoid future problems.

INTRODUCTION

  • Moisture problems included soft wallboard, discoloring of wallboard and temperature imbalances within the home
  • Previously damaged wallboard had been replaced once already by service personnel.  Repairs included placing a vapor barrier between the drywall and the insulation.
  • Factory field personnel were on hand to observe and discuss the cause of the problem.

HOUSE 1

DESCRIPTION

  • 1330 Sq Ft
  • Continuous crawlspace with vented skirting
  • In line fiberglass floor duct system with metal risers – no mastic applied.

OBSERVATIONS

  • Thermostat was set at 78F
  • Master Suite gets very cold compared to rest of house.  Homeowner uses bedroom 2 and 3 as office space with various office and computer equipment.
  • Window air conditioning unit installed in the end bedroom to assist in cooling.
  • Approximate 2 square inch hole noted in supply duct near master bedroom riser.
  • The refrigerant line penetration through the air handler cabinet not sealed.
  • 3-inch spacer left in plenum.
  • Rodent damage in belly (previously noted by homeowner)
  • West end wall of master bathroom with possible moisture problem.

TESTING

Duct test

A duct system airtightness test was also completed.  A duct tester was attached to the air handler unit.  The supply registers were temporarily sealed off and the system was then depressurized to 25 pascals.  The total and outside leakage flow components were measured.  An airtight duct system would have zero leakage or both the CFM25total and CFM25out would be 0.

Duct System Airtightness

CFM25total  = 148

Pressure diagnostic testing

Pressure differential measurements were completed to determine a magnitude and direction of flow across the envelope when the air handler fan operates.  Interior door closure effect was also measured when the air handler fan operated. 

Pressure Diagnostics w/ AHU
(Note: the winds were calm)

Condition

Pressure differential (main wrt outside)

All fans off

0 pa

AHU on

-1.6 pa

AHU on & master suite door closed

-10.7 pa

AHU on & all interior doors closed

-13.0 pa

The pressure difference was also measured across each closed door when the air handler fan was operating (all supply registers were open and exhaust was off).

Pressure across closed doors

Pressure differential (room wrt main)

Master bedroom

24.5 pa

Center Bedroom

3.9 pa

End Bedroom

6.6 pa

EFFECTS

  • Return air path to AHU is hindered when bedroom doors are closed – especially the master suite door.
  • Flow imbalances cause the master bedroom to be overcooled before the other bedrooms are cooled.  This overcooling causes the exterior vinyl covered walls to drop to the ambient air dewpoint temperature or below.
  • Duct leakage, on the supply side, causes the entire building to operate at a negative pressure.  Any pathway from the exterior to the interior – such as electrical penetrations- provides a pathway for ambient air to reach interior surfaces.  One such area is at the light fixture mounted on the wall of the master bath.

RECOMMENDATIONS

  • Keep thermostat set at 78 F or above.
  • The flow imbalances (especially the excessive air in the master suite) should be corrected.
  • All duct leaks should be repaired with mastic.  The supply plenum and all risers should be checked and repaired as needed.  The refrigerant line penetration through the air handler cabinet should also be sealed.  The duct leakage should not exceed 3% of floor area or CFM25 less than 40.
  • The 3-inch reducer in the supply plenum should be removed.
  • A separate return direct to the AHU is needed (through the wall or jump duct) from the master suite.
  • Sufficient return air pathways should be installed in the rest of the bedrooms.
  • All belly penetrations should be sealed with a permanent, long-lasting seal. No duct tape.
  • In general, vinyl covered exterior drywall should not be used in hot and humid climates.
 

HOUSE 2

DESCRIPTION

  • 1368 Sq Ft
  • Continuous crawlspace with vented skirting
  • Attic flex duct system.
  • 3.5-ton A/C compressor – 3 row indoor coil

OBSERVATIONS

  • Thermostat was set at 76F
  • Homeowner reports that house has a very quick cool down.
  • Pink spotting” noted in center and end bedrooms.  Appears to be in path of supply air register throw.  Moisture content measured with a moisture meter appear normal.
  • Possible water damaged in hallway due to roof flashing leak at exhaust fan.
  • Airflows were measured from each supply register – very close to design flows.

TESTING

Blower door test

A blower door test was done to determine the airtightness of the building envelope.  A series of building pressures and associated airflows was recorded.  This provides the necessary inputs to determine the CFM50 of the house.

Blower Door Test

CFM50 = 808

[C=77.5, n=0.60, r=0.989]

The values of C and n can be used as inputs for the house airflow equation, Q=C* Pn .  Thus, for any given pressure difference,  P, the airflow crossing the building’s envelope can be determined.

Duct test

A duct system airtightness test was also completed.  A duct tester was attached to the air handler unit.  The supply registers were temporarily sealed off and the system was then depressurized to 25 pascals.  The total and outside leakage flow components were measured.  An airtight duct system would have zero leakage or both the CFM25total and CFMout would be 0.

Duct System Airtightness

CFM25total  = 46

Pressure diagnostic testing

Pressure differential measurements were completed to determine a magnitude and direction of flow across the envelope when the air handler fan operates.  Interior door closure effect was also measured when the air handler fan operated. 

Pressure Diagnostics w/ AHU

(Note: the winds were slight)

Condition

Pressure differential (main wrt outside)

All fans off

0 pa

AHU on

0 pa

AHU on & master suite door closed

0 pa

AHU on & all interior doors closed

0 pa

The pressure difference was also measured across each closed door when the air handler fan was operating (all supply registers were open and exhaust was off).

Pressure across closed doors

Pressure differential (room wrt main)

Master bedroom

1.0 pa

Center Bedroom

1.0 pa

End Bedroom

1.0 pa

Airflow testing

The duct tester may also be used as a powered flow hood.  The flow from each supply register was measured and compared to the as designed airflows 


Air Flow At Supply Registers

(Measured and Design CFM)

Location

Designed

Measured

Variance

Master Bath

90

96

107%

Master Bed

178

161

90%

Kitchen

78

118

151%

Dining Room

186

180

97%

LivingRoom1

106

130

123%

LivingRoom2

106

117

110%

Bed 1

103

112

109%

Bed 2

161

140

87%

Hall Bath

44

75

170%

EFFECTS

  • It appears that the duct system leakage, return air pathways and airflows to various zones is within acceptable limits.
  • The air conditioning system appears to be oversized which allows for the rapid cool down of the home that homeowner commented on.  This leads to short cycling of the compressor and inadequate runtime of the system to provide dehumidification.  The higher interior humidity level causes the occupant to lower the thermostat seeking cooling comfort.
  • The supply registers in the bedrooms with the “pink” spotting are blowing cooled air out the exterior vinyl covered gypsum.  This “washing” of the wall by the cool supply air will tend to lower its temperature – more than likely below the exterior dewpoint.
  • The wall construction may allow for the intrusion of liquid water.  Though the design appears to be an approved technique, there is a lack of a continuous drainage system.  This may allow water to enter the wall cavity in a liquid form and be trapped.

RECOMMENDATIONS

  • Keep thermostat set at 78 F or above.
  • The supply registers in the bedrooms should be redirected as to prevent “washing” of the exterior walls.
  • The exterior wall design should be invested.  The manufacturer of the siding product should be called in to assist in the investigation and offer their expertise.
  • Proper sizing of the air conditioning system is important when it is to used in a hot humid climate.  Or a stand alone dehumidification system should be employed.
  • In general, vinyl covered exterior drywall should not be used in hot and humid climates.
HOUSE 3

DESCRIPTION

  • 1368 Sq Ft
  • Continuous crawlspace with vented skirting Attic flex duct system.
  • 3.5-ton A/C compressor – 3 row indoor coil
 

OBSERVATIONS

  • Thermostat was set at 76F
  • Homeowner reports that house has a very quick cool down.
  • “Pink spotting” noted in center and end bedrooms.  Appears to be in path of supply air register throw.  Moisture content measured with a moisture meter appear normal.
  • Possible water damaged in hallway due to roof flashing leak at exhaust fan.
  • Airflows were measured from each supply register – very close to design flows.

TESTING

Blower door test

A blower door test was done to determine the airtightness of the building envelope.  A series of building pressures and associated airflows was recorded.  This provides the necessary inputs to determine the CFM50 of the house.

Blower Door Test

CFM50 = 808

[C=77.5, n=0.60, r=0.989]

The values of C and n can be used as inputs for the house airflow equation, Q=C* Pn .  Thus, for any given pressure difference,  P, the airflow crossing the building’s envelope can be determined.

Duct test

A duct system airtightness test was also completed.  A duct tester was attached to the air handler unit.  The supply registers were temporarily sealed off and the system was then depressurized to 25 pascals.  The total and outside leakage flow components were measured.  An airtight duct system would have zero leakage or both the CFM25total and CFM25out would be 0.

Duct System Airtightness

CFM25total  = 46

Pressure diagnostic testing

Pressure differential measurements were completed to determine a magnitude and direction of flow across the envelope when the air handler fan operates.  Interior door closure effect was also measured when the air handler fan operated. 

Pressure Diagnostics w/ AHU

(Note: the winds were slight)

Condition

Pressure differential (main wrt outside)

All fans off

0 pa

AHU on

0 pa

AHU on & master suite door closed

0 pa

AHU on & all interior doors closed

0 pa

The pressure difference was also measured across each closed door when the air handler fan was operating (all supply registers were open and exhaust was off).

Pressure across closed doors

Pressure differential (room wrt main)

Master bedroom

1.0 pa

Center Bedroom

1.0 pa

End Bedroom

1.0 pa

Airflow testing

The duct tester may also be used as a powered flow hood.  The flow from each supply register was measured and compared to the as designed airflows 

Air Flow at Supply Registers

(Measured and Design CFM)

Location

Designed

Measured

Variance

Master Bath

90

96

107%

Master Bed

178

161

90%

Kitchen

78

118

151%

Dining Room

186

180

97%

LivingRoom1

106

130

123%

LivingRoom2

106

117

110%

Bed 1

103

112

109%

Bed 2

161

140

87%

Hall Bath

44

75

170%

EFFECTS

  • It appears that the duct system leakage, return air pathways and airflows to various zones is within acceptable limits.
  • The air conditioning system appears to be oversized which allows for the rapid cool down of the home that homeowner commented on.  This leads to short cycling of the compressor and inadequate runtime of the system to provide dehumidification.  The higher interior humidity level causes the occupant to lower the thermostat seeking cooling comfort.
  • The supply registers in the bedrooms with the “pink” spotting are blowing cooled air out the exterior vinyl covered gypsum.  This “washing” of the wall by the cool supply air will tend to lower its temperature – more than likely below the exterior dewpoint.
  • The wall construction may allow for the intrusion of liquid water.  Though the design appears to be an approved technique, there is a lack of a continuous drainage system.  This may allow water to enter the wall cavity in a liquid form and be trapped.

RECOMMENDATIONS

  • Keep thermostat set at 78EF or above.
  • The supply registers in the bedrooms should be redirected as to prevent “washing” of the exterior walls.
  • The exterior wall design should be invested.  The manufacturer of the siding product should be called in to assist in the investigation and offer their expertise.
  • Proper sizing of the air conditioning system is important when it is to used in a hot humid climate.  Or a stand alone dehumidification system should be employed.
  • In general, vinyl covered exterior drywall should not be used in hot and humid climates.

Pictures - House 1

Front elevation

Master bath wall with moisture problem

MS bath plumbing penetration with what appears to be evidence of rodent traffic.

Air handler unit located adjacent to master suite.

Refrigerant line penetration “sealed” with fiberglass insulation.  This is a direct leak path to the floor cavity, which brings warm moisture air from the crawlspace through the floor cavity and into the conditioned air stream.

 

House 2

 

Exterior elevation

Siding with obvious gap

AC nameplate

Supply register in bedroom

“Pink spotting” in one of the bedrooms

Ground cover – typical

 

House 3

 

Exterior elevation

Siding with obvious gap

AC nameplate

Wet crawlspace with ground cover and venting

 
Supply register in bedroom blowing onto wall assembly.  Pink spotting noted in air pathway.  


Disclaimer: This report was prepared as an account of work sponsored by an agency of the United States government. Neither the United States government nor any agency thereof, nor any of their employees, makes any warranty, express or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed, or represents that its use would not infringe privately owned rights. Reference herein to any specific commercial product, process, or service by trade name, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise does not necessarily constitute or imply its endorsement, recommendation, or favoring by the United States government or any agency thereof. The views and opinions of authors expressed herein do not necessarily state or reflect those of the United States government or any agency thereof.

Home | Overview | Activities | Team Members | Case Studies
Current Data | Publications | Researchers | Contact Us


Copyright © 2004 Florida Solar Energy Center. All Rights Reserved.

Please address questions and comments regarding this web page to BAIHPMaster