II.
BAIHP Technical Assistance (S)
- Sandspur
Housing
Maitland, Florida
Category
B
Since 2002, FSEC staff have been working
with Sandspur Housing, the largest affordable home builder
in the nation. Sandspur constructs approximately 4,000
apartment units per year, primarily in Florida and
Georgia. The company’s
primary interest in Building America is in receiving
assistance for designing low energy-use units with good
indoor air quality and resolving recurrent moisture problems
in Florida’s hot-humid climate. Contact with Sandspur
was initiated by BAIHP subcontractor Florida H.E.R.O.
in Gainesville, Florida.
Sandspur Housing staff were taken on a tour of the David
Hoak demonstration home to show specific equipment and the
role it plays in an overall systems engineering approach.
After the tour, discussions continued on the Landing Community
analysis. This allowed personnel to view firsthand some of
the Building America principles and practices so that they
could explain these concepts to others in the Sandspur organization.
BAIHP has worked with Sandspur in three Florida cities:
Naples, Orlando, and Gainesville.
Naples, Florida
For Camden Cove, Sandspur’s community in Naples,
BAIHP researchers conducted an energy analysis on all individual
units and several apartment buildings slated for construction
in 2003 and 2004. Information from Sandspur’s building
plans was combined with Florida H.E.R.O.’s field experience
in Sandspur's Gainesville apartment complex Harbor Cove Community.
Results indicated an opportunity to cost-effectively reduce
energy use/cost in a 16-unit apartment building by more than
20% while improving indoor air quality and durability. Since
Sandspur was already building fairly tight duct systems,
savings potential in this area was already being achieved.
Additionally, heating and cooling loads in multi-dwelling
buildings are lower than similar size and construction single
family detached housing because there are fewer exterior
surfaces.
Energy efficiency recommendations included:
- Switching to 75% fluorescent lighting
- Reducing duct leakage to the outside
to 3% (Qn out ≤ 0.03)
- Reducing window area to 6% of floor area
- Window shading strategies to provide overall solar heat
gain coefficient of 0.2
- Installing ducts inside the conditioned space
- SEER 13.0 cooling systems
- White metal roofing or radiant barrier
- Programmable thermostats
- Ceiling fans in all bedrooms and main living areas
Air quality improvement strategies focused on including:
- Pleated return air filters rated with an Minimum Efficiency
Reporting Value (MERV) of 11
- Filtered mechanical ventilation of 7.5 CFM/person +
0.01 CFM/ft 2
- Supplemental dehumidification
- Quiet, energy efficient bathroom exhaust
fans with timer switches (≤0.3 watts/ft 3)
- Quiet, energy efficient vented kitchen range hoods in
each unit
A summary of all analysis results and building design features
was prepared and submitted to Sandspur Housing. Two meetings
were held to review the recommendations.
Orlando Moisture Investigations
FSEC staff tested four Sandspur-built apartment units and
installed datalogging equipment in six units at the Landings
Community in Orlando where some units had reported moisture
problems. Measured envelope leakage was typical for new construction,
and all but one unit had very tight duct systems. Dataloggers
(stand alone temperature RH loggers) were deployed in the
air handler of each unit to record interior moisture levels.
Three weeks of data were plotted for six apartments as temperature,
relative humidity, and dew point. Ambient weather data from
the nearby Hoak house datalogger was included and compared
favorably with published Orlando airport weather.
To continue investigating the cause of excess moisture
in the apartment units, datalogging equipment was installed
in six additional units. To remedy problems, prototype schemes
were evaluated such as utilizing a humidistat in conjunction
with thermostat, and installation of a dedicated dehumidifier.
Data analysis will be completed in 2004.
Gainesville, Florida Brookside Apartment Complex
During the 5 th budget period, work was completed
on testing and rating all 176 units in Sandspur’s
Energy Star apartment complex Brookside in Gainesville, FL.
Apartment features are given in Table 21. Each apartment
was individually tested for envelope and duct air tightness
as well as flow through the passive outdoor air system by
Bob Abernethy, FSEC technician, in collaboration with Florida
H.E.R.O. Results are listed in Table 21 below. The
complex consists of one to four bedroom models grouped into
two-story buildings of eight to 16 units.
Table
21 Brookside Apartments Characteristics |
Component |
Description |
Conditioned area |
1 Bedroom unit =717 sq.
ft.
2 Bedroom unit = 990 sq. ft.
3 Bedroom unit = 1313 sq.
ft.
4 Bedroom unit = 1582 sq. ft.
|
HERS Score |
86.1 - 87.7 |
Mechanical and System |
Interior air handler
Fresh
air ventilation
Engineered and right sized systems
Engineered duct design
|
Fresh Air Ventilation |
4” fresh
air duct provides 34 to 45 cfm to house side of HVAC
filter when mechanical system is running. Manual
damper provided. |
Heating |
Hydronic heat coils fed
by a conventional gas water heater in an exterior closet |
Cooling |
SEER 12 AC - was SEER 10
1
and 2 Bedroom units = 1.5 Ton - was 2-2.5 Ton
3 and
4 Bedroom Units = 2 Ton - was 2.5-3 Ton
|
Ducts |
Mastic sealed and tested |
Duct Leakage |
CFM25 out < 5%
of AHU flow |
Wall insulation |
Unfaced fiberglass batt
(first cost savings of $0.22/sq ft and reduced site
labor) |
Windows |
. |
Glazing & Frame |
. |
Cary Park, North Carolina
BAIHP researcher compared two energy savings improvements:
(1)upgrade from SEER-10 to SEER-11, and (2) add a programmable
thermostat to the SEER-10 unit.
Analysis
The Groves at Cary Park Apartments include a group of five
buildings with 12 units each for a total of 120 units. A
detailed computer simulation analysis was performed on a
single, representative unit to compare the two energy saving
measures using Energy Gauge USA version 2.3, which is based
on the DOE2.1E simulation engine. The apartment chosen was
a top floor 2-bedroom unit with north-facing windows since
these units make up 50% of the complex whereas the remaining
1, 3 and 4 bedroom units make up 17%, 20% and 13% respectively
and because the top floor 1 and 2 bedroom apartments are
the only ones with exposure to an attic space over their
entire floor area. The top floor 3 and 4 bedroom apartments
are only partially exposed to an attic space while the remainder
(about half the floor area) is below a 1-bedroom unit. The
added attic exposure increases the heating and cooling loads
on the top floor 1 and 2 bedroom units and is likely to present
a worse-case scenario in terms of space conditioning load
per square foot.
An hourly computer simulation of a top floor 2-bedroom apartment
with north-facing windows was performed using TMY weather
data for Raleigh, North Carolina. Four of the five buildings
shown on the site plan are oriented at or very near to an
east-west axis, causing the majority of windows to have either
north or south exposures. The fifth building is oriented
on a north-south axis. Specifications as taken from the plans
provided are listed in Table 22.
Table
22 2-Bedroom Apartment Specifications |
Conditioned Area |
1,081 sq.ft. |
Walls |
Wood Frame (R-13) |
Ventilated Attic |
R-30 |
Roof |
Dark shingles, 1:300 ventilation |
Floor |
R-99 (to simulate no load) |
Double Pane Vinyl Windows |
U-0.57, clear glass |
Infiltration |
5.0 ACH50, or 0.183 ACH |
Ducts |
R-6, Qn-0.06, 9.4% air
loss |
Thermostat |
Non-programmable |
Setpoints |
Cooling
75°F, Heating
70°F |
Lighting |
10% Fluorescent |
Ventilation |
none |
SEER-10
The HVAC schedule in the building plans specifies a Carrier
38YKC024 heat pump compressor and FF1CN024 air handler for
the 2-bedroom apartments. Literature downloaded from the
Carrier website lists this combination as having efficiency
ratings of SEER-10.3 for cooling and HSPF-7.0 for heating.
SEER-11
Product data on the 38YKC shows that several other air
handler models (most of which are variable speed) can be
used to achieve a SEER rating of 11 or higher and can boost
the HSPF to 7.2. These efficiency ratings were compared against
the SEER-10 unit in an hourly simulation and showed a savings
of 138 kWh/year or $12/year at an electric utility rate of
$0.0826/kWh.
SEER-10 plus Programmable Thermostat
Estimated savings from using a programmable
thermostat in conjunction with the SEER-10 heat pump slightly
exceeded the savings from going to the SEER 11 efficiency
upgrade alone and showed a savings of 177 kWh/year or $15/year.
A 3 °F temperature difference was used for a nighttime
heating set-back from 11pm to 7am and daytime cooling set-up
from 9am to 3pm.
Table
23 Estimated Annual Heating and Cooling Energy Use |
. |
SEER-10.3 / HSPF-7.0 |
SEER-11 / HSPF-7.2 |
SEER-10.3 w/prog.t-stat |
Heating kWh |
1,542 |
1,511 |
1,397 |
Cooling kWh |
2,006 |
1,899 |
1,974 |
Total kWh |
3,548 |
3,410 |
3,371 |
Annual Savings ($)* |
. |
$12 |
$15 |
*Estimated annual
savings based on electric utility rate of $0.0826/kWh |
Conclusion
While it appears from the Carrier literature
that the cooling efficiency on this heat pump model can
be brought to SEER-11 by upgrading only the air handler,
equivalent or better savings can also be obtained by employing
a modest (3 °F) set-back/set-up
schedule with a programmable thermostat.
- Southern
Energy Homes
Addison, Alabama
Category
D, 12,803 Homes
Technical Assistance by BAIHP
Researchers Neil Moyer and David Beal
Trip
Report
|
Figure 39 Southern Energy
Homes quality control engineer conducts in-plant duct
leakage test. |
During the 1 st budget period, BAIHP held a meeting
to introduce Building America to the industry. Representatives
from Southern Energy Homes attended in hopes of finding
solutions to moisture problems they were experiencing
in coastal areas. In 2000, BAIHP researchers conducted
building science diagnostics in several moisture damaged
homes in coastal Louisiana and found contributing factors
to be duct leakage and inadequate return air pathways
from bed rooms.
Southern Energy Homes took steps to achieve substantially
leak free duct systems in all their homes. They switched
from UL 181 approved tapes to mastic and fiberglass mesh
for forming component connections in all their duct systems
and began testing duct systems during production (Figure
39).
In 2002 FSEC received a request to certify the Southern
Energy Homes (SEH) factory in Addison, Alabama for Energy
Star compliance. A plant visit in August 2001 examined
opportunities to enhance manufacturing productivity.
Three model homes were tested for Energy Star certification,
recommendations were made, and Energy Star plant certification
paperwork submitted to US EPA.
In 2003 discussions continued with SEH plant personnel
for conducting an analysis at one of their factories
using the UCFIE simulation tool. On January 27 and 28,
FSEC conducted site visits and performed diagnostic tests
on several problem homes and submitted recommendations
in a trip report in February. Based on these recommendations,
FSEC conducted duct test training for factory personnel
in four Southern Energy Homes factories.
In May of 2003 FSEC certified a Southern Energy Homes
factory for EnergyStar production. FSEC conducted diagnostic
field visits to Southern Energy homes in December 2003
and January of 2004 and provided recommendations in trip
reports. Infrared inspection of the recommended retrofits
were done in April 2004.
In 2004 two Moisture related home inspections were
done, the first in August and the second in September.
Recommendations were made in trip reports.
- Spain
Construction
Gainesville, Florida
Category B, 33 Homes
In
the 6 th budget period an evaluation of a homeowner complaint
of significant condensation on the interior of the windows
was made. Recommendations made were the installation of
a passive outside air system which solved “95%” of
the problem according to the homeowner, and the use of
independent dehumidification to eliminate the rest.
Florida
H.E.R.O. worked with Spain Construction in the 5th reporting
period to address a homeowner comfort complaint and to
assist the builder’s mechanical contractor
in designing a distribution system in a new Willowcraft
community custom home. Diagnostic tests and Manual
J calculations performed for the homeowner complaint determined
that the mechanical system was oversized by one ton.
In addition to the air handler filter, the researcher
also located a second filter at the return grill. The
homeowner was unaware of this filter, so its replacement
significantly improved the system airflow. Florida
HERO recommended the introduction of outside air to the return
side of the system to facilitate positive pressurization
and to slightly increase the load and diminish some
of the effects of oversizing.
The
builder has improved his specifications from standard code
compliance (SEER 10, single pane windows, etc.) to HERS
ratings of 87.5 - 89.4 for 100% of his homes. They feature
SEER 13 air conditioning, double pane vinyl frame with
low-E glass (SHGC of .34), air handler in conditioned space,
R-30 ceiling and R-13 wall cellulose insulation. A few
homes had ducts in conditioned space.
Stylecrest Sales, formerly called Coleman HVAC Systems,
is a major provider of mechanical system components to
the manufactured housing industry. IN helping various
home manufacturers resolve duct leakage issues, BAIHP
has worked extensively with the engineering staff at
Stylecrest to resolve such problems as dimensional coordination
of duct components, assembly procedures, and standards
in duct joining recommendations.
BAIHP researchers also met with Stylecrest Sales to
discuss Energy Star plant/home certification procedures
and collected cost data for a variety of HVAC system
sizes. In 2004, FSEC visited a moisture damaged home
in Port Fouchon (LA) at the request of Stylecrest that
was built by Southern Energy Homes using Stylecrest components.
(See Section III, Research, Moisture Damaged Homes.)
|