|
|
|
Reference
Publication:
Chandra, Subrato, Neil Moyer, Danny Parker, David Beal,
David Chasar, Eric Martin, Janet McIlvaine, Ross McCluney,
Andrew Gordon, Mike Lubliner, Mike McSorley, Ken Fonorow,
Mike Mullens, Mark McGinley, Stephanie Hutchinson, David
Hoak, Stephen Barkaszi, Carlos Colon, John Sherwin, and
Rob Vieira. Building America Industrialized Housing
Partnership, Annual Report - Fifth Budget Period. 4/1/03
- 3/31/04. |
|
|
Building
America Industrialized Housing Partnership, Annual
Report - Fifth Budget Period |
|
|
Subrato
Chandra, Neil
Moyer, Danny
Parker, David
Beal, David
Chasar, Eric
Martin,
Janet
McIlvaine, Ross
McCluney, Andrew
Gordon, Mike
Lubliner, Mike McSorley,
Ken
Fonorow, Mike
Mullens, Mark
McGinley, Stephanie
Hutchinson, David
Hoak,
Stephen
Barkaszi, Carlos
Colon, John
Sherwin,
and Rob Vieira |
|
Florida
Solar Energy Center |
|
|
|
1.
BAIHP TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE
The BAIHP team provided technical assistance to HUD Code
Home manufactures, modular home manufacturers, and site builders
including Habitat for Humanity International and its affiliates
throughout the nation. Site builders receiving technical
assistance are located primarily in the hot-humid region
of North and Central Florida.
Systems engineering forms the core of the Building America
approach. BAIHP Industry Partners evaluate the integration
of their construction standards and consider improvements
that enhance energy efficiency, durability, indoor air quality,
and health of their homes. The Industry Partner decides which
improvements to implement.
In providing technical assistance BAIHP generally recommends
improving equipment efficiency and reducing conditioning
loads while taking durability and health issues into consideration.
Some examples include:
Improving Equipment Efficiency
- High efficiency, correctly sized heating and cooling
equipment
- Interior duct systems and unvented attics
- High efficiency water heating, appliances, and lighting.
Reducing Conditioning Loads
- Well orientated and shaded windows
- Climate appropriate windows characteristics
- Reflective or absorptive surfaces (roof, wall)
- Continuous thermal, moisture, and air barriers
Durability and Indoor Air Quality
- Fresh air ventilation
- Moisture control
- Balanced/controlled air flow
- Reduced long term maintenance needs
It is the combination of these improvements that enables
the BAIHP Industry Partners to achieve high performance homes (Figure
2) to move the homebuilding industry toward DOE’s
2010 goals. Table 2, Homes Built in Partnership with
BAIHP , shows BAIHP Industry Partner production in 4
categories:
- Category A: Homes meeting the Building America
program goal of saving 40% of heating, cooling and water
energy use, incorporating fresh air ventilation, and including
superior durability and health features. HERS scores are
greater than 88.6.
- Category B: Homes meeting the EPA Energy Star
criteria for saving 30% of heating, cooling, and water
heating energy use.
- Category C: Homes with energy efficiency improvements
that fall slightly short of the EPA Energy Star criteria
for saving 30% of heating, cooling, and water heating energy
use. HERS score of approximately 85. Also homes designed
and built to this level or higher that have not been specifically
rated and tested by BAIHP.
- Category D: Manufactured
homes built with substantially leak free ducts (Qn OUT £ 0.03).
This category may include some Category B and C homes.
Since inception, BAIHP has assisted home builders and manufacturers
to construct:
- 11,767 homes built to Energy Star level or better (Category
A and B, Table 2)
- 11,746 homes built 30% to 50% better than the HUD code
- approx 5% below Energy Star (Category C, Table 2)
- ~46,400 manufactured homes with airtight duct systems (Category
D, Table 2)
- Estimated energy savings to homeowners: Over $10 million
annually
Section II describes each BAIHP Industry Partnership, arranged
alphabetically. Readers may contact the BAIHP researchers noted
in the heading of each summary for further information. Many
of these Industry Partners are also featured on the BAIHP website
at www.baihp.org.
Figure 2 Building America
homes like this one built by BAIHP Industry Partner G.W.
Robinson Homes in the Cobblefield community (Gainesville,
Florida) reduce energy bills for individual homeowners while
pushing the standard of building closer to DOE’s 2010
goals.
Table
2 Homes Built in Partnership with BAIHP (through
2/28/04) |
Category
/ Industry Partner |
Homes |
Dates |
Category
A Building America Level Homes, HERS scores ≥ 88.6 |
Homes
assisted by Florida H.E.R.O. (Builders: Atlantic Design,
GW Robinson, HKW Enterprises, Spain) |
57 |
Oct
02 - Feb 04 |
Fallman
Design and Construction |
2 |
09/01
- 08/03 |
Sharpless
Construction |
1 |
06/02 |
WCI |
1 |
08/03 |
Applegren
Construction (East Dakota Housing) |
2 |
08/03 |
Habitat
for Humanity, Lakeland, FL |
1 |
06/01 |
Category
A Total |
64 |
|
Category
B (Includes Category A) Energy Star and Beyond,
HERS scores ≥ of ≈86 |
Super
Good Cents/Natural Choice (West of the Cascades) |
7,808 |
09/99
- 01/04 |
Homes
by Florida H.E.R.O. |
1,015 |
~01/00
- 02/04 |
Palm
Harbor Homes |
13 |
~01/00
- 05/02 |
Habitat
for Humanity |
265 |
98
- 07/03 |
Homes
by D.R. Wastchak in Phoenix |
2,658 |
~01/00
- 10/02 |
Marquis
Construction |
1 |
06/03 |
Applegren
Construction |
5 |
08/03 |
Redman
Homes |
1 |
12/01 |
Cambridge
Homes |
1 |
05/03 |
Category
B Total |
11,767 |
|
Category
C Energy Improved Homes, Not Energy Star, HERS ≈ 85
or not rated |
Super
Good Cents Homes (East of the Cascades)
and Natural Choice Homes (only through 11/30/01) |
9,841 |
09/99
- 01/04 |
Energy
Efficient Div. of PHH, in North Carolina |
1,645 |
09/99
- 02/01 |
Habitat
Homes (approx.) |
260 |
95
- 01 |
Category
C Total |
11,746 |
|
Category
D - Homes with Airtight Ducts through end of 2002
(May include B and C homes) |
|
Total |
2000 |
2001 |
2002 |
Palm
Harbor Homes |
32,000 |
11,361 |
11,000 |
9,639 |
Cavalier |
1,132 |
1,132 |
0 |
0 |
Southern
Energy |
12,803 |
3,000 |
5,600 |
4,203 |
Fleetwood
- Auburndale |
500 |
-- |
-- |
500 |
Category
D Total |
46,435 |
|
|
|
Approximate
Savings |
Energy
Use |
718,124
mBtu annual |
Energy
Cost at $14/mBtu |
$10,053,739
annually |
|
Disclaimer:
This report was prepared as an account of work sponsored by an agency
of the United States government. Neither the United States government
nor any agency thereof, nor any of their employees, makes any warranty,
express or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility
for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information,
apparatus, product, or process disclosed, or represents that its use
would not infringe privately owned rights. Reference herein to any
specific commercial product, process, or service by trade name, trademark,
manufacturer, or otherwise does not necessarily constitute or imply
its endorsement, recommendation, or favoring by the United States
government or any agency thereof. The views and opinions of authors
expressed herein do not necessarily state or reflect those of the
United States government or any agency thereof.
|